Subject	I thought about that, but I just got a new efi harness for m
Posted by	RedTTZ91(OK) on September 08, 2008 at 5:45 PM
	This message has been viewed 119 times.
In Reply To	Why not just buy a '95? posted by TriniTT on September 08, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Message	90-93, and dont feel like changing it again, and why not a 94 motor? and I already got my jwt chip for my ecu, and would end up not being worth it in the end...
Follow Ups	ordering a motor for 90-93 tt - RedTTZ91(OK) 17:36:50 09/08/08 Why not just buy a '95? - TriniTT 17:39:31 09/08/08 I thought about that, but I just got a new efi harness for m - RedTTZ91(OK) 17:45:42 09/08/08 '95 is when they changed the fuel rails. - TriniTT 17:51:06 09/08/08 I feel ya but Ill go my way, I understand what your saying - RedTTZ91(OK) 17:57:42 09/08/08 :::sigh::: - ZLover4Life 18:09:52 09/08/08 Im talking about the cam and crank angle sensor flaw... (n/m) - RedTTZ91(OK) 18:11:08 09/08/08 2nd, unless it's a early production 90TT with - BigTDogg (MA) 19:02:34 09/08/08 Re: :::sigh::: - not scared 19:43:12 09/08/08 post pics that prove the problem is legitimate soft valves - ZLover4Life 21:23:43 09/08/08 Mine were just like that...died at 14 years and 169K miles (n/m) - Myndblur (Daytona) 22:10:10 09/08/08 350 in 39000 is assuming the motor is from a 90, right? - TriniTT 23:10:02 09/08/08 soft valve heads were produced in late-1989 to early-1990 - ZLover4Life 23:43:30 09/08/08 I think his point was that RedTT will be buying from a - na300zx (OH) 10:31:29 09/09/08 ah, yes... good point (my mistake) - ZLover4Life 12:32:54 09/09/08 Re: post pics that prove the problem is legitimate soft valv - not scared 13:35:12 09/09/08 I said 0.9%, which is not the same a 0%. - ZLover4Life 21:42:04 09/09/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.